Is love marriage better or arranged marriage? Someone asked me.
Well, both types have their logic. Those who think that love marriage is better, they argue that life partners must know each other well. Both couples should truly love each other, appreciate each other’s choice and ignore each other’s ills. Moot point is that they will spend the entire life as a couple, so initial objections or hiccups from each other’s family may be ignored. The family won’t continue life long rather after ten years or so, a new family will take place.

Those who argue for arranged marriage cite that marriage is never between two persons (couples). It’s a marriage between two families, kith and kin. Both couples are placed at par while redefining the relations. For example, in Indian culture generally, the wife is younger compared to the husband. Now husbands younger brother has to respect the wife (sister-in-law) although the wife is younger compared to his brother in law. That means whoever younger to her husband in her in-laws’ family will be considered junior to the wife irrespective of the fact whether some are elder than the wife by age. Similarly, a husband has to respect whoever is senior to his wife even if some are younger to him by age.

Pro-love marriage people cite that arrange-marriage although tenable, the disturbance and dissent among couples continue. Pro-arranged marriage community always point the rate of divorce among love marriages. interestingly both groups never cite the happily married couples in both cases.

I always think that marriage is a compromise. One need a life partner for sure. No two people can ever be a perfect match because all humans irrespective of genders are unique in their attitude, thought process, attributes and behaviour. One can’t expect that another will be the same as he/she is. That means you have to compromise. Those who have love marriage also realise the same after some years of marriage because the reality of character of the couple only tested during the maintaining of married life. If you continue your life struggle for at least a couple of years, the entire pre-marriage love falls apart because of the hard realities of life

A perfect or successful marriage is where both couples adjust themselves to suit each other. Here ‘The art of appreciation’ plays an important role. Husband may think his wife is not perfect. But he can appreciate her brighter side ignoring any wrong side. This applies to the wife too. The husband may not be her ‘dream prince’ in case of an arranged marriage or ‘the man she loved before marriage’ in love marriage, but then she can find the brighter side of her husband to openly appreciate and ignore any wrong side lately discovered or known.

I think that family doesn’t start from a couple only. Family is a continuous process where batons are transferred generation to generation. Thus, the present-day nuclear families are not as great as the extended families which continue generation wise. Anyway, in many cases, it’s also seen that nuclear families are better than extended families. That means nothing is wrong or impossible if one knows how to manage through various compromises of married life. Point is simply that one has to make himself/herself compatible with whichever family he/she belongs to for a peaceful and happy life that included married life too.

When you say that somebody is unfit to you, then you concede that you too are unfit to that person. For example, if a cap is unfit for the bottle, then the bottle too is unfit for the cap. The day you realise this you won’t find anybody unfit to you.

Powered by Froala Editor

Products and industries are always dependent on the labor class of society, in order to meet the needs of the society and country's dimension and, finally, to play an important role in international relations. It is human abilities and talents in the countries which can differentiate the comparative advantage, as well as economics, developed and underdeveloped countries. So, with expert and healthy human resources, can trend the economy of a country in the first place independently and finally at the level of developed countries.

To summarize the principles of human capital and its impact on the growth of the economy in several items.

Educational Development and Economic Growth

There are underdeveloped countries which, fortunately, has been able to work on education quantity in recent one and a half decade and to create more public and private education centers. However, there are shortcomings in the quality of the citizen's education as much as it should be.

The government must work with long-run economic plans to help prevent the migration and human capital from the country by providing better technical training and high wages of expert labors and encouraging them.

High-quality human capital is an asset which plays a key role On Agriculture industries, growth domestic production, GNP, industrial enterprises and etc... Governments simply cannot afford without investment on human capital in economic growth and development.

Importance of Human Resources on Economic Development:

Proper Utilization of Resources:

Human capital is considered the important type of resources for attaining economic development of a country. Among various types of resources, human resources are the most active type of resources. Qualitative and quantitative development of human capital is very much required for the proper utilization of natural resources of the country.

Some countries are one of the richest natural resources countries in the world, which has a dire need for the human capital and foreign direct investment, which to can use appropriate from the human capital into the use of limit natural resources.

Increased Productivity:

According to some economists, one of the major factors of production is labor or human capital. The establishment of industries is required labor to produce more quality products more efficiently. Certain countries cannot use maximum from its human capital with lack of unproductive investment management. And that is why this country has been the records of the upward curve in poverty, unemployment, and immigration.

Development of Skills:

One of the reasons for the lack of developing countries is the lack of investment in human capital and social considerations. Our country consists of a traditional and classical ideology that cannot provide the necessary skills for all types of people in rural areas. Hence the agricultural industries and labor activities are faced with the lack of skills in technological developing. Therefore, investment in human capacities is required for developing of economics in underdeveloped countries.

An inflow of technology from foreign countries can pave the way for adoption of modern technology into production and thereby can improve the productive capacities. Moreover, the human capital formation can promote the higher growth of the economy by adding physical stock of capital of the country.

Raises Per capita Income:

More qualitative human resources will help in the rapid growth of production, as well as the creation of commercial transactions, to make more exchanges, to produce more goods and services. And export to other countries. With increases in production and establishment of industrial enterprises, per capita income of the people rises and continues to increase national capital.

Improving the standard of life welfare:

Human resource development can pave the way for improving people's overall quality of life in general. This can be achieved by improving the three components of the Human Development Index (HDI), namely increasing per capita income, educational achievements and increasing life expectancy.

Education as a major important issue in a community and is one of the basic human needs for the betterment of skills. The relationship between education and the development of a country's economy is based on increasing labor -class skills and competing for per capita income. People invest in their own personal income in order to gain useful skills and knowledge. There are differences in wages in a competitive economy that reflects the difference in levels of human resource development.

Poverty, unemployment, inequality, downward in gross domestic investment, budget deficit, in some countries are factors that were considered with lack of investment in education and human developing capacity

More Information:

The story of human civilization is the story of human resource development. The societies that were able to develop and progress were the societies that succeeded in developing and harnessing human resources. Those unable to develop human resources remained backward and oftentimes became dominated by those with developed human resources. Initially the stress was on brawn, the brute strength that enables hard laborious work to be done. Intelligence was not at a premium. Moving huge boulders to build the pyramids in the end depended on large numbers of well-built workers. On their own, the workers would not have been able to accomplish what they did, but the supervisors and the engineers applied the brute strength of the workers to achieve the wonders that we still see today. The societies that developed themselves based on human resources became stratified with manual workers at the bottom and the others above, graded according to their level of skill and intelligence. Those able to manage human resources would attain the highest level. In themselves, they constituted the highest level of human resource. In many societies, the stratification became institutionalized and embedded in the culture. It became even a part of their beliefs and religions. This is what we have to this day. In most societies, a very complex system of castes based on the specialization of labour and occupation tends to make an appearance. Once this happens, the upward mobility of the lower castes is hindered. Much potential is lost. But in some societies, the stratification is not very rigid and it is possible for skills to be developed by the lower caste to the extent that upward mobility is attained. The more upwardly mobile the human resources, the greater will the availability of developed human resources be. Today, outwardly at least, we do not believe in castes or stratification. Members of any stratum can move up or down as they are able, and society benefits because the potential of all can be exploited to the maximum. It is this realization that has made human resource development an important matter for any society wishing to progress.

Powered by Froala Editor

Money and knowledge are influential forces in society, each with its own power and significance. Money provides comfort, security, and access to opportunities such as education and influence. However, its power is temporary and depends on how it is managed. Knowledge, gained through learning and experience, empowers individuals to think critically, make informed decisions, and contribute meaningfully to society. Unlike money, knowledge is a lasting asset that continuously enriches lives and enables personal growth and progress. Money can open doors, but it is ultimately knowledge that allows individuals to walk through them successfully. Regardless of financial status, knowledge is accessible to those willing to learn and improve themselves. Through education and self-improvement, individuals can broaden their horizons, expand possibilities, and overcome limitations. Money may seem more powerful in the short term, but its influence is limited compared to the enduring power of knowledge. By valuing and pursuing knowledge alongside wealth, individuals can truly harness their full potential and make a positive impact on themselves and the world around them.

What is yellow journalism, and how did this term come about?

Yellow journalism is a type of journalism that presents little or no legitimate, well-researched news and instead uses eye-catching headlines, exaggerated stories, and misleading information to increase newspaper sales and readership. The term "yellow journalism" originated in the late 19th century, referring to the use of yellow ink in a comic strip published by Joseph Pulitzer, a leading practitioner of the style.

Yellow journalism itself is not illegal, as it is protected by freedom of the press in many countries. However, the use of false information and libelous content in journalism is illegal and can result in legal action. While yellow journalism may not be illegal, it is often criticized for its lack of journalistic integrity and its potential to mislead and manipulate the public.    

Does yellow journalism provide an important function for society?

I believe Yellow Journalism is corrupt. The writing is very biased, which steers the story away from the facts. It traps readers into believing something that is severely blown out of proportion. Readers get hyped up from the exaggerated writing...over nothing!! Yellow journalist are not writing to inform the public; they are writing to win a popularity contest.

Why is yellow journalism called yellow?
The term likely derives from a comic strip character known as the Yellow Kid, a boy usually dressed in a yellow nightshirt. The character was created by Richard F. Outcault and first became popular in the New York World, a highly sensational newspaper. Outcault was hired by a competitor, the New York Journal American, and both papers published versions of the character drawn by different artists.
These papers became known as “the yellow kid papers” and the sensational, often wildly inaccurate reporting became known as “yellow kid journalism” and later just “yellow journalism.”
The word “yellow” also has a slang meaning of “cowardly” in American English, something that I suspect contributed to the lasting use of the term “yellow journalism” long after the comic strip character faded into obscurity.

What should be done to put a full stop on the yellow journalism?

Putting a full stop on yellow journalism involves a combination of individual and collective efforts. As an individual, you can practice critical thinking and media literacy by verifying information from multiple reliable sources before believing or sharing it. Supporting ethical journalism by subscribing to reputable news outlets and reporting misleading or false information can also make a difference. On a larger scale, promoting media literacy education in schools, advocating for transparent and accountable media practices, and holding media organizations accountable for ethical standards can help combat yellow journalism. It's an ongoing process that requires vigilance and participation from both individuals and society as a whole.

Yellow journalism is a controversial style of journalism. Some people argue that it is unethical and that it undermines the credibility of the news media. Others argue that yellow journalism is simply a reflection of the public's appetite for sensationalized news.
Whether or not you agree with yellow journalism, it is a style of journalism that has had a lasting impact on the news media. It is important to be aware of the characteristics of yellow journalism so that you can make informed decisions about the news you consume.

More Aspects:

The relationship between freedom of the press and yellow journalism is complex and multifaceted. While freedom of the press is a fundamental right and a cornerstone of democracy, it can also be misused to spread misinformation and sensationalism. Yellow journalism, a type of journalism characterized by its use of exaggerated headlines, fabricated stories, and sensationalized reporting, emerged in the late 19th century, coinciding with the expansion of freedom of the press in the United States. Several factors contributed to the rise of yellow journalism, including: The expansion of literacy and readership: As more people gained access to newspapers, publishers sought to attract and retain readers by using more captivating and attention-grabbing methods. The rise of mass production and distribution: The development of new printing technologies and transportation systems enabled newspapers to reach a wider audience, increasing competition for readership. The pursuit of profits: Newspapers became businesses driven by advertising revenue, putting pressure on publishers to increase circulation and generate interest in their publications. In this competitive environment, some publishers adopted yellow journalism tactics to boost their sales. They employed sensational headlines, exaggerated stories, and fabricated accounts to capture the public's attention and sell more newspapers. This approach proved effective in attracting readers, particularly those interested in crime, scandal, and adventure. However, yellow journalism came at a cost. It undermined the credibility of the press, eroded public trust in journalism, and contributed to the spread of misinformation. The exaggerated and often fabricated stories presented in yellow journalism publications blurred the lines between fact and fiction, making it difficult for readers to distinguish between reliable and unreliable sources of information. The rise of yellow journalism highlighted the need for ethical standards and responsible journalism practices. As a result, professional organizations and codes of ethics were developed to guide journalists and promote ethical reporting. These efforts aimed to restore the credibility of the press and uphold the principles of responsible journalism. While freedom of the press remains essential for a healthy democracy, it must be exercised with responsibility and ethical considerations. Journalists must strive to provide accurate and truthful information, avoiding sensationalism and fabrications that undermine the public's trust in the media. The balance between freedom of the press and responsible journalism is crucial for maintaining a well-informed and engaged citizenry.

Powered by Froala Editor